Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
54.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX edges out Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (5.56 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
