Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
