Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
