Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X
