Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX and Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX offers a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, while Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX
