Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX offers a weight of 275g / 9,7oz, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX
