Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX and Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX offers a weight of 275g / 9,7oz, while Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
