Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the total score (6.62 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX
