Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX and Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX offers a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, while Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX
