Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
