Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin INKS 2000X
