Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (6.62 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX