Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and weight (275g / 9,7oz). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX