Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
92.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Daiwa BG
Spinning
69.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.77 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €104.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/220
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X clearly outshines Daiwa BG 3500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and weight (270g / 9,52oz). While Daiwa BG 3500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa BG?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa BG 3500X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Delphin HORNET 50X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Delphin HORNET 50X
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X
Delphin HORNET 40X vs Delphin HORNET 50X
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X