Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
92.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Delphin HORNET?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X
