Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and the weight (220g / 7,76oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX
Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
