Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX
