Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (7.63 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
