Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.8:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a ergonomics of 6.27 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Delphin REDIX
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX