Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.7:1) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a ergonomics of 6.27 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X