Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
