Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
