Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX edges out Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5+1 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
