Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X
