Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Delphin INKS 6000X
Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R