Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.6:1 and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX
