Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD, C3000XG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, TPC3000XGFD
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €389.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000XG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Shimano Talica 20II CAM, 2-Speed, right hand, Multi fishing reel, TAC20IICAM
Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €499.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size20II CAM
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeLever drag
  • Handle orientationRight
  • Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1 / 3.1:1) and the ball bearings (6+1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a ergonomics of 6.27 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Talica 20II CAM?

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX

  • Higher gear ratio of 5.2:1 / 3.1:1 (scoring 9.4 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
  • Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time