Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (7.63 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
