Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.74 out of 10) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X
