Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.74 out of 10) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
