Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
