Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
