Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
