Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
