Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (175g / 6,17oz) and total score (7.74 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
