Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
