Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and weight (210g / 7,41oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
