Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
