Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
