Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX
