Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and weight (210g / 7,41oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
