Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX offers a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
