Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.77 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
