Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.77 out of 10) and weight (210g / 7,41oz). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
