Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
85.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
