Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa BG 2500X
