Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.8:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Mitchell 308 2000X
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX