Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 215g / 7,58oz and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
