Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Shimano Twin Power FE

Spinning

76.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.56 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio6.4:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €389.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000XGFE
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency