Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
